Serveur d'exploration sur la musique en Sarre

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Business process management BPM standards a survey

Identifieur interne : 000589 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000588; suivant : 000590

Business process management BPM standards a survey

Auteurs : Ryan K. L. Ko [Singapour] ; Stephen S. G. Lee [Singapour] ; Eng Wah Lee [Singapour]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:F880583C97C6D3CC292F59B1DE204731960BE3B4

English descriptors

Abstract

Purpose In the last two decades, a proliferation of business process management BPM modeling languages, standards and software systems has given rise to much confusion and obstacles to adoption. Since new BPM languages and notation terminologies were not well defined, duplicate features are common. This paper seeks to make sense of the myriad BPM standards, organising them in a classification framework, and to identify key industry trends. Designmethodologyapproach An extensive literature review is conducted and relevant BPM notations, languages and standards are referenced against the proposed BPM Standards Classification Framework, which lists each standard's distinct features, strengths and weaknesses. Findings The paper is unaware of any classification of BPM languages. An attempt is made to classify BPM languages, standards and notations into four main groups execution, interchange, graphical, and diagnosis standards. At the present time, there is a lack of established diagnosis standards. It is hoped that such a classification facilitates the meaningful adoption of BPM languages, standards and notations. Practical implications The paper differentiates BPM standards, thereby resolving common misconceptions establishes the need for diagnosis standards identifies the strengths and limitations of current standards and highlights current knowledge gaps and future trends. Researchers and practitioners may wish to position their work around this review. Originalityvalue Currently, to the best of one's knowledge, such an overview and such an analysis of BPM standards have not so far been undertaken.

Url:
DOI: 10.1108/14637150910987937


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Business process management BPM standards a survey</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ko, Ryan K L" sort="Ko, Ryan K L" uniqKey="Ko R" first="Ryan K. L." last="Ko">Ryan K. L. Ko</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lee, Stephen S G" sort="Lee, Stephen S G" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Stephen S. G." last="Lee">Stephen S. G. Lee</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wah Lee, Eng" sort="Wah Lee, Eng" uniqKey="Wah Lee E" first="Eng" last="Wah Lee">Eng Wah Lee</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F880583C97C6D3CC292F59B1DE204731960BE3B4</idno>
<date when="2009" year="2009">2009</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1108/14637150910987937</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F880583C97C6D3CC292F59B1DE204731960BE3B4/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001A14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001A14</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001891</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000426</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000426</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1463-7154:2009:Ko R:business:process:management</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000589</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000589</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000589</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Business process management BPM standards a survey</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ko, Ryan K L" sort="Ko, Ryan K L" uniqKey="Ko R" first="Ryan K. L." last="Ko">Ryan K. L. Ko</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Singapour</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Advanced Design and Modelling Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Nanyang Technological University</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lee, Stephen S G" sort="Lee, Stephen S G" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Stephen S. G." last="Lee">Stephen S. G. Lee</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Singapour</country>
<wicri:regionArea>School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Nanyang Technological University</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wah Lee, Eng" sort="Wah Lee, Eng" uniqKey="Wah Lee E" first="Eng" last="Wah Lee">Eng Wah Lee</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Singapour</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Planning and Operations Management Research Group, Agency for Science and Technology, Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j">Business Process Management Journal</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1463-7154</idno>
<imprint>
<publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher>
<date type="published" when="2009-09-11">2009-09-11</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">15</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="744">744</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="791">791</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1463-7154</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">1463-7154</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Aalst</term>
<term>Activity diagrams</term>
<term>Aerospace engineering</term>
<term>Analytics</term>
<term>Arkin</term>
<term>Best knowledge</term>
<term>Bpdm</term>
<term>Bpel</term>
<term>Bpel code</term>
<term>Bpel4ws</term>
<term>Bpm</term>
<term>Bpmi</term>
<term>Bpmj</term>
<term>Bpml</term>
<term>Bpmn</term>
<term>Bpms market</term>
<term>Bpql</term>
<term>Bpri</term>
<term>Business analyst</term>
<term>Business analysts</term>
<term>Business analytics</term>
<term>Business documents</term>
<term>Business goals</term>
<term>Business process</term>
<term>Business process designs</term>
<term>Business process integration</term>
<term>Business process management</term>
<term>Business process management standards</term>
<term>Business process modeling</term>
<term>Business process modelling</term>
<term>Business process modelling language</term>
<term>Business process modelling notation</term>
<term>Business process models</term>
<term>Business processes</term>
<term>Business rules</term>
<term>Business vocabulary</term>
<term>Collaborative</term>
<term>Collaborative business processes</term>
<term>Common misconceptions</term>
<term>Complete language</term>
<term>Computer science</term>
<term>Crystal reports</term>
<term>Current standards</term>
<term>Current status</term>
<term>Diagnosis</term>
<term>Diagnosis portion</term>
<term>Diagnosis stage</term>
<term>Diagnosis standards</term>
<term>Dumas</term>
<term>Ebxml</term>
<term>Electronic data interchange</term>
<term>Executable</term>
<term>Execution</term>
<term>Execution standards</term>
<term>Facts rules</term>
<term>February</term>
<term>Formalism</term>
<term>Fundamental differences</term>
<term>Gartner</term>
<term>Gartner research</term>
<term>Graphical</term>
<term>Graphical notations</term>
<term>Graphical standards</term>
<term>Greater agility</term>
<term>Haajanen</term>
<term>Havey</term>
<term>Highest level</term>
<term>Hofstede</term>
<term>Ieee</term>
<term>Info exchange</term>
<term>Information exchange</term>
<term>Information exchange standards</term>
<term>Information systems</term>
<term>Information systems engineering</term>
<term>Information technology</term>
<term>Infrastructure</term>
<term>Intalio</term>
<term>Interchange</term>
<term>Interchange format</term>
<term>Interchange standards</term>
<term>Interface</term>
<term>International conference</term>
<term>June</term>
<term>Koskela</term>
<term>Life cycle</term>
<term>Life cycle stage</term>
<term>Lighthouse point</term>
<term>Management coalition</term>
<term>Management discipline</term>
<term>Many practitioners</term>
<term>Many standards</term>
<term>Mendling</term>
<term>Message exchange</term>
<term>Metamodel</term>
<term>Metamodels</term>
<term>Metastorm</term>
<term>Methodology</term>
<term>Metrics</term>
<term>Microsoft</term>
<term>Model business processes</term>
<term>Modeling</term>
<term>Modeling languages</term>
<term>Modelling</term>
<term>Natural language standards</term>
<term>Notation</term>
<term>Oasis</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Other words</term>
<term>Patterns framework</term>
<term>Petri</term>
<term>Petri nets</term>
<term>Practitioner</term>
<term>Process design</term>
<term>Process execution</term>
<term>Process language</term>
<term>Process mining</term>
<term>Programming</term>
<term>Programming languages</term>
<term>Queensland university</term>
<term>Query</term>
<term>Recent years</term>
<term>Research interests</term>
<term>Research trends</term>
<term>Rosettanet</term>
<term>Rosettanet program</term>
<term>Sbvr</term>
<term>Scheer</term>
<term>Second version</term>
<term>Semantics</term>
<term>Service standards</term>
<term>Shapiro</term>
<term>Singapore</term>
<term>Software</term>
<term>Software systems</term>
<term>Technical knowledge</term>
<term>Theoretical underpinnings</term>
<term>Vendor</term>
<term>Wfmc</term>
<term>Wfms</term>
<term>Wohed</term>
<term>Wsfl</term>
<term>Xlang</term>
<term>Xpdl</term>
<term>Yawl</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage>
<language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract">Purpose In the last two decades, a proliferation of business process management BPM modeling languages, standards and software systems has given rise to much confusion and obstacles to adoption. Since new BPM languages and notation terminologies were not well defined, duplicate features are common. This paper seeks to make sense of the myriad BPM standards, organising them in a classification framework, and to identify key industry trends. Designmethodologyapproach An extensive literature review is conducted and relevant BPM notations, languages and standards are referenced against the proposed BPM Standards Classification Framework, which lists each standard's distinct features, strengths and weaknesses. Findings The paper is unaware of any classification of BPM languages. An attempt is made to classify BPM languages, standards and notations into four main groups execution, interchange, graphical, and diagnosis standards. At the present time, there is a lack of established diagnosis standards. It is hoped that such a classification facilitates the meaningful adoption of BPM languages, standards and notations. Practical implications The paper differentiates BPM standards, thereby resolving common misconceptions establishes the need for diagnosis standards identifies the strengths and limitations of current standards and highlights current knowledge gaps and future trends. Researchers and practitioners may wish to position their work around this review. Originalityvalue Currently, to the best of one's knowledge, such an overview and such an analysis of BPM standards have not so far been undertaken.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Singapour</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Singapour">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Ko, Ryan K L" sort="Ko, Ryan K L" uniqKey="Ko R" first="Ryan K. L." last="Ko">Ryan K. L. Ko</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Lee, Stephen S G" sort="Lee, Stephen S G" uniqKey="Lee S" first="Stephen S. G." last="Lee">Stephen S. G. Lee</name>
<name sortKey="Wah Lee, Eng" sort="Wah Lee, Eng" uniqKey="Wah Lee E" first="Eng" last="Wah Lee">Eng Wah Lee</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000589 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000589 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Sarre
   |area=    MusicSarreV3
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:F880583C97C6D3CC292F59B1DE204731960BE3B4
   |texte=   Business process management BPM standards a survey
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Sun Jul 15 18:16:09 2018. Site generation: Tue Mar 5 19:21:25 2024